Onosamba-Ohindo v. Barr

This critical lawsuit aims to relieve hundreds of people currently detained unjustly pending immigration proceedings. The class action lawsuit includes immigrants detained in Richwood, Louisiana with Department of Justice immigration proceedings in Batavia, New York. Individuals who are not being charged with any criminal offense are being held often for lengthy periods of time due to an inability to pay arbitrary and exorbitant bond fees.

This case addresses three fundamental problems with immigration detention. First, bond is being set on detainees without consideration of ability to pay. This means that wealth status is the sole determinant of whether someone is free or jailed prior to hearing. The result is that poor detainees languish in jail, while rich detainees are able to buy their freedom.

Second, detainees are being denied access to their attorneys. Detainees in Louisiana may appear at hearings by phone because their court proceeding is held in New York. However, immigration judges are refusing to allow attorneys to appear by phone, leaving the detainees unrepresented.

Third, immigration judges are unfairly shifting the burden of proof onto detainees. Under the law, the government has the burden to justify detention but immigration judges are improperly making detainees prove why they should be released. This is an unjust process that results in individuals remaining incarcerated prior to their hearing, after no finding of guilt and no criminal charges brought forth.

The suit was filed jointly by nonprofit law organization Equal Justice Under Law and the New York branch of the ACLU. Phil Telfeyan, Executive Director of Equal Justice Under Law, says, “It is time to bring justice to the countless immigrants being wrongfully detained with unfair bond procedures and unaffordable bond amounts. Through this lawsuit, we aim to ensure these individuals receive a fair and just hearing, as guaranteed by the Constitution."

Appeals Update: In July 2026, Equal Justice Under Law and the New York Civil Liberties Union won an important victory before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, reviving our challenge to unfair bond procedures for people held in immigration detention.

The case was originally allowed to proceed as a class action, and in 2020 the district court ordered immigration judges to provide fairer bond hearings. Under that order, the government was required to prove that continued detention was necessary and immigration judges were required to consider a person’s ability to pay and alternatives to detention. Those protections remained in place for nearly two years. After a subsequent Supreme Court decision (Garland v. Aleman Gonzalez) limited the power of lower federal courts to issue certain classwide injunctions in immigration cases, however, the district court ended the class action and dismissed the case.

We appealed that decision. On July 29, 2026, the Second Circuit vacated the dismissal and sent the case back to the district court. The appeals court held that, even though lower courts are restricted from issuing classwide injunctions in cases like this one, they remain able to grant classwide declaratory relief. The case will now return to the district court for further proceedings, where we will continue fighting to ensure that people are not incarcerated simply because they cannot afford to buy their freedom.